What are some pro-slavery arguments? | Yahoo Answers
in which the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a sweeping pro-slavery decision that Dred Scott decision. Law case. Scott, Dred View All Media. date. March 6, . Even with this weak argument, Taney could have been accused of nothing. Fundamental to Lincoln's argument was his conviction that slavery must be dealt with as a moral wrong. It violated the statement in the. Google "the sons of Ham" and also "biblical justification for slavery". they were superior to slaves, and God had chosen them to be superior.
Inwith the help of antislavery lawyers, Harriet and Dred Scott filed individual lawsuits for their freedom in Missouri state court in St. Louis on the grounds that their residence in a free state and a free territory had freed them from the bonds of slavery.
Although the case was long thought to have been unusual, historians later demonstrated that several hundred suits for freedom were filed by or on behalf of slaves in the decades before the Civil War. Emerson took years to be resolved.
Sanford, a resident of New York state his last name was later incorrectly spelled Sandford on court documents. The case eventually reached the U. Supreme Court, which announced its decision in Marchjust two days after the inauguration of Pres.
He ignored precedent, distorted history, imposed a rigid rather than a flexible construction on the Constitutionignored specific grants of power in the Constitution, and tortured meanings out of other, more-obscure clauses.
His logic on the citizenship issue was perhaps the most convoluted. He admitted that African Americans could be citizens of a particular state and that they might even be able to vote, as they in fact did in some states.
But he argued that state citizenship had nothing to do with national citizenship and that African Americans could not sue in federal court because they could not be citizens of the United States. On this point, however, Taney stood on shaky constitutional ground: Newspaper notice for a pamphlet on the U. Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision.
Library of Congress, ng. The son of a merchant sailing master, William Lloyd Garrison was born in Newburyport, Massachusetts, in Due in large measure to the Embargo Act, which Congress had passed inthe Garrison family fell on hard times while William was still young. In William's father deserted the family, forcing them to scrounge for food from more prosperous families and forcing William to work, selling homemade molasses candy and delivering wood. Inafter suffering through various apprenticeships, Garrison began work for the Newburyport Herald as a writer and editor.
This job and subsequent newspaper jobs would give the young Garrison the skills he would utilize so expertly when he later published his own paper. When he was 25, Garrison joined the Abolition movement. He became associated with the American Colonization Society, an organization that believed free blacks should emigrate to a territory on the west coast of Africa. At first glance the society seemed to promote the freedom and happiness of blacks. There certainly were members who encouraged the manumission granting of freedom to slaves.
My boy friend has a confederate flag?
However, it turned out that the number of members advocating manumission constituted a minority. Most members had no wish to free slaves; their goal was only to reduce the numbers of free blacks in the country and thus help preserve the institution of slavery. By Garrison had rejected the programs of the American Colonization Society.3. A Southern World View: The Old South and Proslavery Ideology
By this time he had worked as co-editor of an antislavery paper started by Benjamin Lundy in Maryland, The Genius of Universal Emancipation. And on January 1,he published the first issue of his own anti-slavery newspaper, the Liberator.
In speaking engagements and through the Liberator and other publications, Garrison advocated the immediate emancipation of all slaves.
The Constitution and Slavery - Constitutional Rights Foundation
This was an unpopular view during the s, even with northerners who were against slavery. What would become of all the freed slaves? Certainly they could not assimilate into American society, they thought. Garrison believed that they could assimilate.