# Radioactive age dating depends on

### RADIOACTIVE DATING

Dating - Principles of isotopic dating: All absolute isotopic ages are based on a certain radioisotope disintegrates depends not only on how many atoms of that. Some isotopes have half lives longer than the present age of the . A limitation with all forms of radiometric dating is that they depend on the. Radiometric dating or radioactive dating is a technique used to date materials such as rocks or For most radioactive nuclides, the half-life depends solely on nuclear properties and is essentially a constant. The age that can be calculated by radiometric dating is thus the time at which the rock or mineral cooled to closure.

The decay process is as follows. Particles consist of various subtypes. Those that can decay are mesons and baryonswhich include protons and neutrons ; although decays can involve other particles such as photonselectronspositronsand neutrinos. This can happen due to one of three forces or "interactions": Historically, these are also known as alpha, gamma, and beta decays, respectively.

For example, a neutron-deficient nucleus may decay weakly by converting a proton in a neutron to conserve its positive electric charge, it ejects a positron, as well as a neutrino to conserve the quantum lepton number ; thus the hypothetical atom loses a proton and increments down the table by one element.

A complex set of rules describes the details of particle decays: Decays are very random, but for different elements are observed to conform to statistically averaged different lifetimes.

If you had an ensemble of identical particles, the probability of finding a given one of them still as they were - with no decay - after some time is given by the mathematical expression where is the mean lifetime of the particle when at restproportional to its half-life, and is the relativistic Lorentz factor of the particle.

**What Are The Different Types Of Radioactive Dating?**

This governs what is known as the "decay rate. This makes different elements useful for different time scales of dating; an element with too short an average lifetime will have too few particles left to reveal much one way or another of potentially longer time scales. Hence, elements such as potassium, which has an average lifetime of nearly 2 billion years before decaying into argon, are useful for very long time scales, with geological applications such as dating ancient lava flows or Martian rocks.

Carbon, on the other hand, with a shorter mean lifetime of over years, is more useful for dating human artifacts. Atoms themselves consist of a heavy central core called the nucleus surrounded by arrangements of electron shellswherein there are different probabilities of precisely locating a certain number of electrons depending on the element.

### Radioactive age - Oxford Reference

One way that a nucleus could be disrupted is by particles striking it. This interpretation unfortunately fails to consider observed energetic interactions, including that of the strong force, which is stronger the electromagnetic force. Outside influences It is important that the sample not have had any outside influences.

One example of this can be found in metamorphic rocks.

For example, with Uranium-lead dating with the crystallization of magma, this remains a closed system until the uranium decays. As it decays, it disrupts the crystal and allows the lead atom to move. Likewise, heating the rock such as granite forms gneiss or basalt forms schist.

- Radioactive dating
- Radiocarbon dating

This can also disrupt the ratios of lead and uranium in the sample. Calibration In order to calibrate radiometric dating methods, the methods need to be checked for accuracy against items with independently-known dates.

## radioactive age

Carbon dating, with its much lower maximum theoretical range, is often used for dating items only hundreds and thousands of years old, so can be calibrated in its lower ranges by comparing results with artifacts who's ages are known from historical records. Scientists have also attempted to extend the calibration range by comparing results to timber which has its age calculated by dendrochronologybut this has also been questioned because carbon dating is used to assist with working out dendrochronological ages.

Otherwise, calibration consists of comparing results with ages determined by other radiometric dating methods. However, tests of radiometric dating methods have often shown that they do not agree with known ages of rocks that have been seen to form from volcanic eruptions in recent and historic times, and there are also examples of radiometric dating methods not agreeing with each other.

Young earth creationists therefore claim that radiometric dating methods are not reliable and can therefore not be used to disprove Biblical chronology.

## Radiometric dating

Acceptance and reliability Although radiometric dating methods are widely quoted by scientiststhey are inappropriate for aging the entire universe due to likely variations in decay rates.

To date older fossils, other methods are used, such as potassium-argon or argon-argon dating. Other forms of dating based on reactive minerals like rubidium or potassium can date older finds including fossils, but have the limitation that it is easy for ions to move into rocks post-formation so that care must be taken to consider geology and other factors.

Radiometric dating and YEC[ edit ] See the main article on this topic: Young Earth creationism Radiometric dating — through processes similar to those outlined in the example problem above — frequently reveals that rocks, fossilsetc. The oldest rock so far dated is a zircon crystal that formed 4. They tie themselves in logical knots trying to reconcile the results of radiometric dating with the unwavering belief that the Earth was created ex nihilo about 6, to 10, years ago.

Creationists often blame contamination Indeed, special creationists have for many years held that where science and their religion conflict, it is a matter of science having to catch up with scripture, not the other way around. This is frequently because the selected technique is used outside of its appropriate range, for example on very recent lavas. In attempting to date Mt.

### Dating - Principles of isotopic dating | stirim.info

Helens, creationists attempted discredit the discipline through dishonest practices. Ultimately these "creation scientists" were forced to admit that even for methods they accepted as sound, the age of the Earth would be vastly greater than the 6, they set out to prove.

Is radioactive decay constant? An enormous amount of research shows that in the lab decay rates are constant over time and wherever you are. Faced with this, creationists say that you can't extrapolate from this to deduce they are correct over billions of years.