# Rubidium strontium dating formula for guys

### K-Ar dating calculation (video) | Khan Academy

An oversight in a radioisotope dating technique used to date everything from The ratios of strontium to rubidium and strontium are thought to only be " So, there's not a simple equation that can be applied to every circumstance. . Parenting · Pregnancy · Sexual Health · Skin Care · Men's Health. Rubidium-strontium dating equation, what do men really want in a wife? including plagioclase feldsparK-feldsparhornblendebiotiteand dating equation. Radiometric dating or radioactive dating is a technique used to date materials such as rocks or Among the best-known techniques are radiocarbon dating, potassium–argon dating and uranium–lead dating. The basic equation of radiometric dating requires that neither the parent nuclide nor the daughter product can.

A ratio for average continental crust of about 0. This difference may appear small, but, considering that modern instruments can make the determination to a few parts in 70, it is quite significant. Dissolved strontium in the oceans today has a value of 0. Thus, if well-dated, unaltered fossil shells containing strontium from ancient seawater are analyzed, changes in this ratio with time can be observed and applied in reverse to estimate the time when fossils of unknown age were deposited.

Dating simple igneous rocks The rubidium—strontium pair is ideally suited for the isochron dating of igneous rocks. As a liquid rock cools, first one mineral and then another achieves saturation and precipitates, each extracting specific elements in the process.

Strontium is extracted in many minerals that are formed early, whereas rubidium is gradually concentrated in the final liquid phase. In practice, rock samples weighing several kilograms each are collected from a suite of rocks that are believed to have been part of a single homogeneous liquid prior to solidification.

The samples are crushed and homogenized to produce a fine representative rock powder from which a fraction of a gram is withdrawn and dissolved in the presence of appropriate isotopic traces, or spikes. Strontium and rubidium are extracted and loaded into the mass spectrometer, and the values appropriate to the x and y coordinates are calculated from the isotopic ratios measured.

Once plotted as R1p i. Using estimates of measurement precision, the crucial question of whether or not scatter outside of measurement error exists is addressed. Such scatter would constitute a geologic component, indicating that one or more of the underlying assumptions has been violated and that the age indicated is probably not valid.

For an isochron to be valid, each sample tested must 1 have had the same initial ratio, 2 have been a closed system over geologic time, and 3 have the same age. Well-preserved, unweathered rocks that crystallized rapidly and have not been subjected to major reheating events are most likely to give valid isochrons.

Weathering is a disturbing influence, as is leaching or exchange by hot crustal fluids, since many secondary minerals contain rubidium. Volcanic rocks are most susceptible to such changes because their minerals are fine-grained and unstable glass may be present.

On the other hand, meteorites that have spent most of their time in the deep freeze of outer space can provide ideal samples. Dating minerals Potassium -bearing minerals including several varieties of mica, are ideal for rubidium—strontium dating as they have abundant parent rubidium and a low abundance of initial strontium.

When minerals with a low-rubidium or a high-strontium content are analyzed, the isochron-diagram approach can be used to provide an evaluation of the data. As discussed above, rubidium—strontium mineral ages need not be identical in a rock with a complex thermal historyso that results may be meaningful in terms of dating the last heating event but not in terms of the actual age of a rock.

Dating metamorphic rocks Should a simple igneous body be subjected to an episode of heating or of deformation or of a combination of both, a well-documented special data pattern develops.

With heat, daughter isotopes diffuse out of their host minerals but are incorporated into other minerals in the rock. When the rock again cools, the minerals close and again accumulate daughter products to record the time since the second event. Remarkably, the isotopes remain within the rock sample analyzed, and so a suite of whole rocks can still provide a valid primary age.

This situation is easily visualized on an isochron diagram, where a series of rocks plots on a steep line showing the primary age, but the minerals in each rock plot on a series of parallel lines that indicate the time since the heating event.

If cooling is very slow, the minerals with the lowest blocking temperature, such as biotite mica, will fall below the upper end of the line. The rock itself gives the integratedmore gradual increase. Approaches to this ideal case are commonly observed, but peculiar results are found in situations where the heating is minimal.

Epidote, a low-temperature alteration mineral with a very high concentration of radiogenic strontium, has been found in rocks wherein biotite has lost strontium by diffusion. The rock itself has a much lower ratio, so that it did not take part in this exchange.

### Dating - Rubidium–strontium method | stirim.info

Although rubidium—strontium dating is not as precise as the uranium—lead method, it was the first to be exploited and has provided much of the prevailing knowledge of Earth history.

The procedures of sample preparationchemical separation, and mass spectrometry are relatively easy to carry out, and datable minerals occur in most rocks. Precise ages can be obtained on high-level rocks i. The mobility of rubidium in deep-level crustal fluids and melts that can infiltrate other rocks during metamorphism as well as in fluids involved in weathering can complicate the results.

Samarium—neodymium method The radioactive decay of samarium of mass Sm to neodymium of mass Nd has been shown to be capable of providing useful isochron ages for certain geologic materials. Both parent and daughter belong to the rare-earth element group, which is itself the subject of numerous geologic investigations.

All members of this group have similar chemical properties and charge, but differ significantly in size. Because of this, they are selectively removed as different minerals are precipitated from a melt. In the opposite sense, their relative abundance in a melt can indicate the presence of certain residual minerals during partial melting.

Unlike rubidium, which is enriched over strontium in the crust, samarium is relatively enriched with respect to neodymium in the mantle. Consequently, a volcanic rock composed of melted crust would have elevated radiogenic strontium values and depressed radiogenic neodymium values with respect to the mantle.

As a parent—daughter pair, samarium and neodymium are unique in that both have very similar chemical properties, and so loss by diffusion may be reduced. Their low concentrations in surface waters indicates that changes during low-temperature alteration and weathering are less likely. Their presence in certain minerals in water-deposited gold veins, however, does suggest mobility under certain conditions. In addition, their behaviour under high-temperature metamorphic conditions is as yet poorly documented.

The exploitation of the samarium—neodymium pair for dating only became possible when several technical difficulties were overcome.

**Radiometric dating**

Procedures to separate these very similar elements and methods of measuring neodymium isotope ratios with uncertainties of only a few parts inhad to be developed. In theory, the samarium—neodymium method is identical to the rubidium—strontium approach. Both use the isochron method to display and evaluate data. I'm just going to make up these numbers. And usually, these aren't measured directly, and you really care about the relative amounts. But let's say you were able to figure out the potassium is 1 milligram.

And let's say that the argon-- actually, I'm going to say the potassium found, and let's say the argon found-- let's say it is 0. So how can we use this information-- in what we just figured out here, which is derived from the half-life-- to figure out how old this sample right over here? How do we figure out how old this sample is right over there? Well, what we need to figure out-- we know that n, the amount we were left with, is this thing right over here.

So we know that we're left with 1 milligram. And that's going to be equal to some initial amount-- when we use both of this information to figure that initial amount out-- times e to the negative kt. And we know what k is. And we'll figure it out later.

So k is this thing right over here. So we need to figure out what our initial amount is.

### Radiometric dating - Wikipedia

We know what k is, and then we can solve for t. How old is this sample? We saw that in the last video. So if you want to think about the total number of potassiums that have decayed since this was kind of stuck in the lava. And we learned that anything that was there before, any argon that was there before would have been able to get out of the liquid lava before it froze or before it hardened.

So maybe I could say k initial-- the potassium initial-- is going to be equal to the amount of potassium 40 we have today-- 1 milligram-- plus the amount of potassium we needed to get this amount of argon We have this amount of argon 0. The rest of it turned into calcium And this isn't the exact number, but it'll get the general idea.

- Rubidium–strontium dating
- K-Ar dating calculation

And so our initial-- which is really this thing right over here. I could call this N0. This is going to be equal to-- and I won't do any of the math-- so we have 1 milligram we have left is equal to 1 milligram-- which is what we found-- plus 0. And then, all of that times e to the negative kt. And what you see here is, when we want to solve for t-- assuming we know k, and we do know k now-- that really, the absolute amount doesn't matter.

What actually matters is the ratio. Because if we're solving for t, you want to divide both sides of this equation by this quantity right over here. So you get this side-- the left-hand side-- divide both sides. You get 1 milligram over this quantity-- I'll write it in blue-- over this quantity is going to be 1 plus-- I'm just going to assume, actually, that the units here are milligrams. So you get 1 over this quantity, which is 1 plus 0.

That is equal to e to the negative kt. And then, if you want to solve for t, you want to take the natural log of both sides. This is equal right over here.

You want to take the natural log of both sides. So you get the natural log of 1 over 1 plus 0. And then, to solve for t, you divide both sides by negative k. So I'll write it over here.

And you can see, this a little bit cumbersome mathematically, but we're getting to the answer. So we got the natural log of 1 over 1 plus 0. Well, what is negative k? We're just dividing both sides of this equation by negative k. Negative k is the negative of this over the negative natural log of 2 over 1. And now, we can get our calculator out and just solve for what this time is. And it's going to be in years because that's how we figured out this constant.

So let's get my handy TI First, I'll do this part. So this is 1 divided by 1 plus 0. So that's this part right over here. That gives us that number.

## Radiometric dating

And then, we want to take the natural log of that. So let's take the natural log of our previous answer. So it's the natural log of 0. It gives us negative 0.